Blog
Diamond Trail

The Evolution of Cyber Threat Intelligence: From Threat Detection with IOCs to Defense Intelligence with IOBs

October 10, 2025
Team Cyware
Team Cyware

IOC/IOB

Summary: The shift from Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) to Indicators of Behavior (IOBs) marks a move from reactive to proactive threat detection. While IOCs reveal past breaches, IOBs expose attacker tactics in real time. Powered by AI and automation, Cyware enables SOCs to unify intelligence, detect behaviors, and respond faster.

As the cybersecurity industry is trending towards getting ahead of threats, it’s rethinking its reliance on reactive IOCs. 

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) are digital breadcrumbs that lead teams on a wild goose chase after the fact. On the other hand, Indicators of Behavior (IOBs) are patterns of malicious intent that manifest during or even before the attack, so teams have a chance to stop the compromise earlier in the game. 

Organizations today can’t afford to give attackers the element of surprise, or any head start or advantage. That’s why they’re making the shift from reactive IOC security to proactive IOB defense.  

What are Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)? 

Indicators of compromise are digital footprints left behind by threat actors. They are the tell-tale clues of the attack, and what SOCs rely on in investigations. Examples of IOCs include: 

  • Hashes 

  • IPs 

  • Domains 

  • Registry changes 

What are Indicators of Behavior (IOBs)? 

IOBs are the modern counterpart to traditional IOCs. They get out in front of what’s happening by providing behavioral clues as to what is going wrong before it results in an IOC. 

IOBs entail the underlying attacker tactics, techniques, and procedures (TTPs) that precede a compromise, and include things like: 

  • Credential dumping: Harvesting credentials indicates that an attack is already underway. At the point at which credentials can be exfiltrated, threat actors have already gained entry and, in many cases, escalated privileges to access where those secrets are stored. 

  • Lateral movement patterns: These include Pass-the-Hash and Pass-the-Ticket techniques, accessing other systems via exploited Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), exploiting unpatched vulnerabilities, and more.  

  • Persistence techniques: As attackers look to maintain their foothold, they might modify the Windows Registry to ensure their malicious code runs on startup, leveraging Task Scheduler to initialize malware at regular intervals, or create new user accounts and forwarding rules.  

These provide proactive visibility into intent and context, not just artifacts. This lets SOCs know ahead of time what attackers might be planning and enables them to step in earlier in the kill chain for more effective defense.  

The table below sums up the differences between IOCs and IOBs. 

Aspect 

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs) 

Indicators of Behavior (IOBs) 

Focus 

Evidence of past compromise – what has already happened. 

Early signs of malicious behavior – what is happening or about to happen. 

Detection Timing 

Reactive – detected after compromise has occurred. 

Proactive – detected during attack progression, before damage is done. 

Lifespan/Usefulness 

Short-lived – attackers can quickly change IPs, hashes, and domains. 

Longer-lasting – behaviors are harder for attackers to change consistently. 

Context 

Low context – isolated data points that require correlation. 

High context – linked to TTPs mapped to frameworks like MITRE ATT&CK. 

Value to Security 

Helps with attribution, incident investigation, and blocking known threats. 

Enables detection of novel threats, adaptive defense, and disruption of attack chains. 

 Why the Industry is Shifting 

Security teams are shifting defense tactics because threat actors are getting better at their craft. Constant obfuscation and polymorphism make IOCs unreliable, leaving SOCs with heavy blind spots.

As IOCs become harder to catch before compromise, the industry is emphasizing behavior-driven detection. Attackers may hide their malicious code, but they cannot hide the nefarious actions that achieve their goals - their IOBs. MITRE ATT&CK provides context for mapping these behaviors across the attack lifecycle, while MITRE D3FEND offers structured defensive countermeasures for detection strategies. ATT&CK Flow helps map adversary sequences to anticipate and respond to threats.

Compromised credentials are frequently reused for lateral movement. Attackers leverage valid identities, making endpoint-based IOC detection insufficient. Observing post-login behavior and identity movement is crucial, requiring correlation of IOBs with telemetry from Cloud, Identity, SIEM, and EDR tools to distinguish normal from anomalous activity.

Automation and AI enable behavioral analytics at scale, spotting malicious behaviors across the environment. Modern AI goes beyond detection- it analyzes patterns, generates and modifies detection rules, and automatically pushes updates to SIEM, EDR, and NDR tools. This closed-loop automation shifts security operations from reactive to proactive, continuously adapting defenses as threats evolve.

What This Entails for Security Teams 

To keep up with modern threats, security teams must combine signature-based detection with behavior-based analytics. In other words, they will need to leverage threat intelligence not just for “what already happened,” but for “what’s unfolding.”  

This means an increased reliance on context-rich data like telemetry, logs, endpoint behavior, and network patterns to see the disparate threads of attacker patterns. Then, it means unifying them in a single solution, or a suite of solutions, to piece the attack story together and respond in real-time. 

And this requires integration across SOC workflows in the form of detection, triage, and automated response. Cyware’s suite of solutions facilitates this.  

The Road Ahead 

Future-proof SOCs are AI-driven, context-aware, and behavior-first oriented. This means keeping all the good of the past (IOCs) and combining it with the tools of the present (IOBs), for a truly proactive approach. IOCs will always matter, but behaviors tell the real story.  

Cyware Intelligence Suite streamlines this process. Built on top of Cyware Intel Exchange, it does away with fragmented tooling, integration roadblocks, and long deployment cycles to provide unified, end-to-end threat intelligence management. No more platforms that only provide information; Cyware operationalizes threat data for immediate use. 

Working with Cyware Orchestrate enables SOCs to respond at scale using low-code/no-code playbooks that trigger automated workflows across integrated solutions. There are a lot of threat intelligence platforms out there, but with Cyware Intelligence Suite, teams get more than threat ingestion. They get a comprehensive threat intelligence solution, from detection to response. 

Organizations that adopt IOB-focused detection will leave attackers no room to hide. Not only will teams be able to hunt down guilty parties, they’ll be able to stop attacks before they strike.  

Indicators of Compromise (IOCs)Indicators of Behavior (IOBs)Exposure Management

About the Author

Team Cyware

Team Cyware

Discover Related Resources